US Supreme Court Rainbow Flag

On the Way to the Supreme Court

According to reports by the AP, the defenders of the ban against marriage equality in Indiana and Wisconsin have had a hard time before a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Chicago.

Attorneys general in both states asked the appellate court to permanently restore the bans, which were ruled unconstitutional in June.

“Often-blistering questions” were asked of the attorneys representing the two states, with “one Republican appointee judge comparing them to laws, now defunct, that once outlawed weddings between blacks and whites.”

The AP reports that, “Judge Richard A. Posner, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981, hit the backers of the ban the hardest. He balked when the Wisconsin assistant attorney general, Timothy C. Samuelson, repeatedly pointed to tradition as the underlying justification for barring gay marriage.”

Judge Posner said, “It was tradition to not allow blacks and whites to marry — a tradition that got swept away.” Prohibition of same-sex marriage, he said, derives from “a tradition of hate” and “savage discrimination” of gays.

Think of those words from a conservative judge . . . derives from “a tradition of hate” and “savage discrimination” of gays. What clarity of the overall situation.

The AP writes that Posner ran “through a list of psychological strains that the children of unmarried same-sex couples could face, including having to struggle to grasp why their schoolmate’s parents were married and theirs were not.”

“What horrible stuff,” he said. What benefit to society in banning same-sex marriage, he asked, outweighs that kind of harm to children?”

Judge Posner questioned the state’s attorneys with such insight that one could only feel pride for the man.

By all accounts Posner shredded the attorneys representing Indiana and Wisconsin and he became the darling of our community, well, at least those of us who follow such things.

It appears that Posner will not restore the state bans as requested by the states on the grounds of equal protection and his arguments will only support our position as marriage equality now races to the Supreme Court.

The AP reports that the 10th Circuit, in Denver, declared same-sex marriage bans in Utah and Oklahoma to be unconstitutional, and the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va., overturned Virginia’s ban. In each case, application has been stayed pending appeals to the Supreme Court. The Sixth Circuit, in Cincinnati, has heard arguments on marriage restrictions as well, but it has not yet issued a decision.

The arguments put forth by states who are defending their bans on marriage equality will not withhold scrutiny, as Judge Posner proved that in his questioning. And for that we should be very grateful.


Depression – The Silent Killer

To remember Robin Williams is like remembering an old friend who has sadly passed for horrible reasons way before they should have.

I recently lost a dear friend to pancreatic cancer. She faced it bravely ‘til the end while my friends and I journeyed with her on her path to death. From diagnosis to death was less than a year. One last laugh I hoped for.

One last laugh that’s what I want from Robin Williams. But sadly that will not happen. Depth of depression and despair killed. Yes I say killed him, just like cancer killed my friend.

I know, some simply say that Mr. Williams committed suicide . . . he took his own life, he killed himself. But I don’t think it’s that simple. And unless you have been chased by the demons of depression you will never understand the despair that is often felt.

Mr. Williams once said, “Do I perform sometimes in a manic style? Yes. Am I manic all the time? No. Do I get sad? Oh yeah. Does it hit me hard? Oh yeah.”

He knew he was being chased, he knew what the thorn in his side was. And for many years he faced it bravely till the end where one can only imagine the depth of his pain and the despondency he must have been suffering.

This is not like cancer. It’s a different kind of killer. One that comes out of the darkness. Often dealt with in silence . . . never revealing the truth to others for one reason or another.

Depression is dangerous because it grabs hold of the mind and twists it into unrecognizable shadows. Haunting and taunting until it grabs on in such an insidious way that control is futile.

Sadly for far too many this leads to death.

Let Robin Williams death be a light reflecting on the shadows of an issue which we speak so little about. Depression is still spoken of in hushed tones when in fact we should and must be speaking more about it.

I know depression, I have suffered from it most of my life and thankfully for my meds I have the beast under control. But there was a day.

Yes, there was a day when depression almost killed me. I was about 23 or 24 years old and I was at the depths of the darkness of depression and planned my suicide. To make a long story short I met a person who talked to me just when I needed it. He showed me a glimmer of hope and without him know he walked be off the edge. Without him depression would have killed me that night.

It has not been an easy journey to suffer from depression and I appreciate what Mr. Williams must have gone through his last hours. I never really spoke about it but there you have it.

The more you know the better we are at helping others in their depression. It should neither be a mystery nor a burden one should live alone with.

Mayor Michael Nutter

A Second Look

QUEERtimes became a weekly newsletter with our endorsement of Michael Nutter as Mayor of Philadelphia. This was back in May 11, 2007 and we have grown up with Nutter as mayor for the last 7 years. Times have changed but I thought it would be interesting to see what I wrote of Nutter back then.

Here it is:

Since an empty stomach is a bad political advisor, we suggest you all grab a bite to eat before you read this endorsement.

Okay, everyone ready? Here we go!

It’s been said that Philadelphia is the next Greatest American City. If this is true (and we believe that it is), then we must chose a mayor who will provide strong leadership, character, intellect, and a vision of change and growth.

We have watched the debates, seen the campaign ads, reviewed the policies and have carefully considered who this next leader should be. Each time the answer has been the same–Michael Nutter.

Mr. Nutter is by far the strongest candidate to move Philadelphia forward and to provide leadership to change the way Philadelphia is governed. Throughout the debate, Mr. Nutter proved himself to be the most mayoral of all the candidates with strength of leadership that far surpasses the other candidates.

As a member of City Council, he expressed his straightforwardness with the people of Philadelphia and stood up against decades of old school politics that, most agree, has held Philadelphia back all these years.

Mr. Nutter clearly presents the best credentials and agenda to really make Philadelphia become “America’s Greatest City”. He simply is the person for whom the city of Philadelphia will be proud to have as its mayor. When was the last time you felt that way?

If we really want a change in the way Philadelphia is governed and to have a better, brighter future for the city, then we must all take a stand. That stand is definitely a vote for Michael Nutter for our Next Mayor.

Get out and let your queer vote count. Bring all your friends. The future of Philadelphia weighs in the balance.

Well was I right or wrong?

I must admit I’ve had my disappointments with Mayor Nutter and I’m not quite sure that he provided “strong leadership, character, intellect, and a vision of change and growth.”

I still have the foul taste in my mouth of how he cut funding to the arts and the way he mishandled the Boy Scout eviction and subsequent law suit.

Even today he continues to disappoint with his “delay” of signing the new City Council bill decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana while a disproportionate number of the city’s poor are being unjustly criminalized and sent to prisons. The bill would end mandatory custodial arrests for possessing small amounts of marijuana and relegate it to a fine.

This is a national trend and Major Nutter is far behind the curve…so far behind one wonders if he is just calling in his last year or so in office.

Nutter just thinks that people simply shouldn’t smoke pot. Well, that boat has already sailed.

Nutter is on the wrong side of history and today someone’s child or parent was hauled off to jail simply for smoking a joint. That is a travesty; our only hope is that this bill will become law automatically in September if Nutter remains inactive on it. Even If he vetoes it there are enough votes in Council to override it, so why not sign it now Mr. Nutter, and spare the hundreds of more citizens of your city jail time and court.

Not sure if I was right or wrong in that first issue of QUEERtimes but I know today I would most likely not support Nutter as I did then. But hindsight is 20/20 I’m told.



If you don’t know this about me, I love the news, everything about it. I can remember watching it with my “Pop,” my father’s father, at 6 pm whenever he was visiting us or us him. It grew up in the sixties, so my TV visions were of protests, war, assassinations, racial tensions and men walking on the moon. I guess I never realized how much I enjoy absorbing news, but then again I publish a queerNEWS section that has been referred to as the queer Drudge Report.

During the week I review well over 250 LGBTQ centric news items for our news section and often I’ll be inspired by one thing or another to write something for that week.

Recently two articles got my attention.

The first was an article by the Associated Press, as reported by ABC, about comments Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made in an interview with the AP. The 81-year-old Ginsburg stated that the high court would not duck the issue of same-sex marriage the next time it comes around to the court, and predicted that the justices would not delay ruling as they did on interracial marriage bans, which were not formally struck down until 1967.

She expects a case could be heard and decided by June 2016, and possibly a year earlier.

“I think the court will not do what they did in the old days when they continually ducked the issue of miscegenation,” Ginsburg said. “If a case is properly before the court, they will take it.”

Often talked about is the future of Ginsburg on the court, who told Yahoo News that “I’m still here and likely to remain for a while.” She predicting her retirement will come “when I feel myself slipping, when I can no longer think as sharply, write as quickly, that will be the time for me to leave the court.”

She asked AP, “So who do you think could be nominated now that would get through the Senate that you would rather see on the court than me?”

Great question! She is very politically astute.

Ginsburg knows that elections have consequences so who we vote for matters when it comes to our equality; Ginsburg’s replacement may not be as supportive of our equality as she. If it happens to not be Obama who makes that choice for our country and all of our futures, then who will select Ginsburg’s replacement? What will the Senate look like then?

Yes elections still matters when it comes to our equality.

The second article that caught my attention was one from last week from PennLive. It told of a ruling by the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue where they accepted the argument that a widow and her same-sex partner were in a common law marriage and would have been married if not for the law. In the ruling the widow was for the purposes of inheritance tax, which is 15% in Pennsylvania, declared a spouse and therefore owes no inheritance tax and her $21,000 in taxes levied against the estate were waived.

Bravo to the Department of Revenue for doing the right thing. It’s now time to refund the monies to widows and widowers of same-sex partners who met the criteria for a common-law marriage in the state, who if not for the law would have been married.

So you see news is my passion that’s why QUEERtimes takes the time to put together the most comprehensive selection of global LGBTQ news anywhere. We are dedicated to sharing the global LGBTQ experience to as many people as we can, LGBTQ and our heterosexual allies alike. Knowledge is free . . . enjoy!

Homeless Youth

Homeless Queer Youth

A working group here in Philadelphia is seeking to find a solution to the LGBTQ youth homelessness problem. They recently received a briefing from the Attic Youth Center and the numbers and facts they presented are staggering and eye opening.

According to the briefing…

Nationally there is an estimated 1.6 million to 2.8 million homeless youth in the United States out of that 40% of these homeless youth identify as LGBTQ.

Locally we find that “during the Philadelphia school year, 1,688 LGBTQ children and youth experience homelessness. On any given school day, 720 LGBTQ children and youth are experiencing homelessness in Philadelphia.” And, “of the 2,500 Philadelphia youth ages 18 -20 who have been discharged from DHS (Department of Human Services), an estimated 1,000 are LGBTQ.”

Existing housing for homeless youth in Philadelphia is dismal. According to the Attic, “emergency youth shelters have a total of 18 beds available for youth who are not involved with DHS,” and “only one youth program exists in the city that offers crisis shelter for youth 18 -21 (they can accommodate up to 60 youth when using floor mats)” and “there are 91 beds available for the 2,500 youth ages 18 -20 who have been discharged from DHS.

As you can clearly see there is a housing crisis among our homeless youth, especially our LGBTQ younger brothers and sisters who disproportionately make up the youth homelessness crisis.

To help the working group understand LGBTQ homeless youth issues better, the Attic put together a focus group of 20 LGBTQ youth, whose average age was 19, “all of whom had some experience with homelessness and/or were currently homeless.” The average age of the first group of homeless youth was 16.8 years old.

The focus group was asked three questions:

  • How did you become homeless?
  • What was your experience after you became homeless?
  • What would your ideal housing program look like?

Nationally the top five reasons why LGBTQ youth are homeless or at-risk of becoming homeless is that 46% ran away because the family rejected their sexual orientation or gender identity, 43% were forced out by parents because of sexual orientation or gender identity, 32% because of physical, emotional or sexual abuse at home, 17% because of aging out of the foster care system and 14% because of financial or emotional neglect from their families.

The experience of our homeless youth is a sad story for these brave LGBTQ persons.

“I stayed at 4-5 different shelters while trying to get into a youth housing program. I was living day by day and was assaulted regularly. I still wake up terrified each day,” reported one focus group member. Another said, “as a trans woman, staying at the shelter was as scary as it gets.” Another youth “stayed at a shelter and was sexually assaulted.”

Another added that “at the youth housing program, I was told that if I told my roommates I was gay they would hurt me or try to sleep with me. I was kicked out a month later after someone planted a knife in my locker.”

This is scandalous.

The needs in this city alone are so great and overwhelming that it is hard to know where to start first, but bravo to this working group for taking up the cause and helping to seek a solution to this problem.

In time your help will be needed to help fund the solution, as we cannot count on the government on this one. Until then do what you can do to help alleviate the suffering and misery of our homeless queer youth.


Marriage Now and Then

This has been a whirlwind week for me, as I was on Long Island preparing for and attending my niece’s wedding to her long term partner. Actually this was their second wedding . . . their first ceremony was a private wedding in Vermont last year, this was their public ceremony.

The families were all gathered with anticipated joy as the happy couple was walked to the gazebo, where the ceremony was held, by their mothers. Beautiful vows were exchanged and my brother-in-law, my niece’s father, shared beautiful words for the happy couple.

We eat, drank, danced and talked for eight and a half hours before the newlyweds left for their bridal suite where chilled champagne awaited them. As I kissed the brides good night I was walking on air with such happiness because my 86 year old father lived long enough to witness the marriage one of his lesbian granddaughters. And that my mother, who has always wanted to attend a same-sex marriage, perhaps a hint to me, finally got her wish.

Mazel tov to the couple and a long and happy life be theirs!

On another note the Associated Press is reporting that a “The Connecticut high court ruled unanimously Wednesday that a woman whose wife died amidst a medical malpractice case may sue a doctor over the loss of her wife’s companionship and income, even though that right to sue was limited to heterosexual married couples at the time.”

The issue it raises, the AP points out, is whether same-sex marriage rights should be “applied retroactively and qualify same-sex couples for rights and benefits for which they weren’t entitled before state laws allowed them to marry.”

“Although no states that allow gay marriage have made their laws retroactive, many same-sex partners believe they should have received Social Security survivor payments, tax breaks, inheritances and other benefits that were afforded only to heterosexual married couples before gay marriage laws were passed,” reports the AP.

Anti-same-sex marriage advocates believe this ruling could open the floodgates of “reparation” claims. But it really doesn’t. What is does is simply apply the law as if it had always existed. Same-sex marriage has always been a fundamental constitutional right, it has just been denied for far too long. Many couples have suffered from this discrimination. Fortunes were lost to state and federal governments in inheritance taxes alone. These monies correctly, by constitutional right, belong to the long term partners of the deceased.

No, this is not “reparations.” This is returning money that rightfully belongs to the partner of a same-sex couple, married if not for the law.


The End of ENDA?

This week might have marked the end of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, known as ENDA, which passed the U.S. Senate last November, as six major LGBTQ civil rights organizations pulled their support for it because of the current way it is written and the semantics dictate.

Blame the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling where they found that “closely held” stock corporations can choose to be exempt from being required to provide employees with certain types of contraception under the Affordable Care Act based on religious preferences.

In light of the Hobby Lobby ruling, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, Lambda Legal, the National Center for Lesbian Rights and the Transgender Law Center all now cite concerns over the broad religious exemption included in ENDA. They worry that it could be used by corporations to continue to discriminate against LGBTQ people due to religious beliefs.

“Given the types of workplace discrimination we see increasingly against LGBT people, together with the calls for greater permission to discriminate on religious grounds that followed immediately upon the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, it has become clear that the inclusion of this provision is no longer tenable,” the ACLU said in a statement. “It would prevent ENDA from providing protections that LGBT people desperately need, and would make very bad law with potential further negative effects.”

The problem is that the religious exemption clause will allow religious organizations, and now perhaps “closely held” corporations, to discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

“The morning after the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling, we all woke up in a changed and intensified landscape of broad religious exemptions being used as an excuse to discriminate. We are deeply concerned that ENDA’s broad exemption will be used as a similar license to discriminate across the country. We are concerned that these types of legal loopholes could negatively impact other issues affecting LGBT people and their families including marriage, access to HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention and access to other reproductive health services. As one of the lead advocates on this bill for 20 years, we do not take this move lightly but we do take it unequivocally – we now oppose this version of ENDA because of its too-broad religious exemption. We cannot be complicit in writing such exemptions into federal law”wrote the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force’s executive director, Rea Carey in a separate statement.

In June, President Barack Obama announced that he will issue an executive order that would bar federal contractors from discriminating against LGBTQ employees. But the question is, will he add a religious exemption clause or will he heed to voices of justice and right and stand with history and issue an executive order without such a clause?

Make your voices heard, call (202.456.1414) or email the President and ask him not to include a religious exemption clause in his non-discrimination order.


Happy Birthday America

I grew up in an era when the whole town would fall out for the Independence Day parade. The vets, the police and fire departments, all the scouts, marching bands and American flags galore march down the main street through town. I loved seeing the red, white and blue lead the parade and carried by every group represented.

As a Cub Scout and then Boy Scout I was taught the respect of the U.S. flag. In school I was taught the history of it and the men and women who died for it. In the 60’s I watched it both glorified and burned for the sake of freedom. In the 70’s I honored it in many a ceremony and join the Armed Forces to serve under it. In the 80’s I grew a deeper respect for the flag as I lived in Europe and yearned to return to its home. In the 90’s I contemplated it over theological discourse. And in to 00’s I have finally experienced it’s call for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as a LGBTQ rights advocate.

And here we are today, the 238th anniversary of the birth of our great nation where in many parts of the country I am still considered a second class citizen. And while I can marry in many states I can be fired for doing it. I can be legally discriminated against. And there is something seriously wrong with that.

I love the patriotic songs and the stories of the great battles for independence. How many LGBTQ people fought and died alongside their heterosexual brothers and sisters for their God given rights; unalienable rights that we who are created equal should enjoy from our birth?

How many LGBTQ peoples have fought for the freedoms we still seek under the stars and stripes throughout our history?

I fly a flag in my office and I have a couple of flags that have flown over the U.S. Capital. I love that banner of freedom.

Today some member of our community was denied access to their sick partner in a hospital. Today a trans* brother of sister was denied proper healthcare. And today a young person was kicked out of a home for being queer.

I am moved when I see the star spangled banner fly high above buildings, on homes and poles in towns, as a standard for the freedoms, but sadly denied to us.

Today we must hold the flag of the United States of America even higher, on this the celebration of our freedom so that we are reminded of our struggles so as to relish in our victories.

Happy Birthday America, I long for the freedoms that you continue to deny us.

Marriage Equality.02

Marriage Equality One Year Later

This week has brought some interesting milestones on our path to full marriage equality. On Thursday we marked the one year anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United States vs. Windsor when they ruled a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional] The Supreme Court said that the federal government could not deny federal benefits of marriage (such as federal health, tax, Social Security and other benefits) to married same-sex couples, if it is recognized or performed in a state that allows same-sex marriage.

Same-sex couples can now legally marry in 20 states as well as the District of Columbia (California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. Utah has a stay on same-sex marriage pending appeal.)  That means that a majority of Americans live in states where same-sex marriage is legal.

Another milestone on our journey was the first appellate decision for same-sex marriage since the Supreme Court struck down DOMA.   Outlawing same-sex marriage violates citizens’ rights, the three judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver said Wednesday in a historic ruling that rejected Utah’s assertion that marriage between a man and woman best suits children and procreation.

The appeals court set a precedent by finding that voter-approved bans on same-sex marriage — such as Utah’s Amendment 3 — violate the constitutional rights of same-sex couples to equal protection and due process.

Utah now has 90 days to appeal to the full Circuit Court of Appeals or directly to the high court itself.

Also marking a first would be the dissenting judge’s opinion . . . his was the first time since U.S. vs. Windsor has a federal judge argued for keeping a state ban on same-sex marriages.

Judge Paul J. Kelly, Jr., in his minority opinion has broken the string of 16 state and federal judges who sided with same-sex marriage advocates in cases across the country over the past year.

Kelly, 73, is a Republican and appointee of President George H.W. Bush. He has issued a 21-page dissent that warned that his colleagues were overreaching in striking down Utah’s voter-approved gay marriage ban.

Kelly argued that creating a national mandate for same-sex marriage, even in states where it is unpopular, “turns the notion of a limited national government on its head . . . We should resist the temptation to become philosopher-kings, imposing our views under the guise of constitutional interpretation of the 14th Amendment.”

Clearly marriage equality is here to stay and its advancement will continue. Kelly’s dissent uplifted same-sex marriage opponents who for the last year been on a losing streak with the inevitability that now surrounds same-sex marriage.

Much has happened on our road to equality this past year and we must never become disheartened with dissenting opinions for we are on the right side of history and marriage equality will soon be legal in all 50 States.

Barack Obama_Gala.02

Seventeen Minutes with The President

Tuesday night I had the honor and pleasure of joining over 500 LGBT leaders from across the country for the Democratic National Committee LGBT Leadership Council Gala. I was joined by Reggie Shuford of the ACLU, Christopher Bartlett of the William Way Community Center, Ted Martin of Equality PA, Penn. Representative  Brian Sims, Alan Beck of Columbia Fun Maps, John Di Pietro of Di Pietro Law, Activists Arthur Kaplan and Duane Perry, and our host Mel Heifetz.  We were there to hear the President of the United States speak.

As our car arrived at the heavily guarded Gotham Hall on Broadway in Midtown Manhattan, I could feel the anticipation in the air from the gathering attendees.  Excitement was visible on the many faces as we checked in, went through Presidential level security and entered the hall.

The evening was emceed by Modern Family’s Jesse Tyler Fergusson and wonderful speeches given by Ugly Betty star Michael Urie, and beauty queen, transgender model and advocate Geena Rocero.

President Obama was introduced by Edie Windsor and lawyer Roberta Kaplan, the duo who brought down the Defense of Marriage Act.  Both were greeted with a standing ovation.

And so was the President who walked onto the stage at 7:35 PM and spoke to us for 17 awesome minutes.

Obama told us that, “Pride Month is a time for celebration, and this year we’ve got a lot to celebrate.  If you think about everything that’s happened in the last 12 months, it is remarkable.  In nine more states you’re now free to marry the person you love — that includes my two home states of Hawaii and Illinois. The NFL drafted its first openly gay player.  The U.S. Postal Service made history by putting an openly gay person on a stamp — the late, great Harvey Milk smiling from ear to ear.”

He spoke of the great achievements his administration helped to achieve.

“I want to thank all the incredible friends in the room for the support and guidance that so many of you have offered my administration over the past five and a half years.  Sometimes you guys were a little impatient.  Sometimes I had to say, will you just settle down for a second, we’ve got this.  But because of your help, we’ve been able to do more to protect the rights of lesbian, and gay, and bisexual and transgender Americans than any administration in history,” he stated.

Obama repealed “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act with new protections, signed a hate crimes law bearing Matthew Shepard’s name, “because hate-driven violence has taken the lives of too many in this country.”  He lifted the 22-year ban on people with HIV from traveling to the U.S., and prohibited discrimination in hospitals and housing that received federal funding.

The President added that “we’ve got to keep fighting.  We’ve got to keep fighting for the human rights of people around the world — to those who face violence and intimidation every single day, and who live under governments that have made the existence of anybody who’s LGBT illegal.  We need to send a message to those folks.  I want them to hear from the President of the United States . . . We believe in your dignity and your equality, and the United States stands with you . . . And we’ve got to keep fighting to protect the lives of our brothers and sisters here at home.”

Obama ended his speech by telling us that “this is a country where no matter who you are, or what you look like, or how you came up, or what your last name is, or who you love — if you work hard and you take responsibility, you should be able to make it.  That’s the story of America.  That’s the story of this movement.  People who stand up and come out and march, and organize, and fight to expand the rights we enjoy and extend them to other people . . . people who work against the odds to build a nation in which nobody is a second-class citizen, everybody is free to be who they are, and that you’re judged based on are your kind and competent and work hard, and treat each other with respect, and are a team player and look after your community, and care and love and cherish your kids.  That’s how we’re supposed to be judged. . . If you’ve experienced being on the outside, you’ve got to be one to bring more folks in even once you are inside.  That’s our task.  That’s our job.  That’s why we’re here tonight.”

Thank you Mr. President for helping our community achieve so much in the last 5½ years.  We said it here first, you are the “first gay President” and we respect and admire you for it.